Contact Usinfo@lampros.tech

Billions in liquidity can be meaningless if the protocol has no real users.

Conversely, a protocol with millions of users but no liquidity struggles to offer value or sustainability.

In Web3, protocols that manage to balance both are the ones worth watching.

When we talk about protocols, we mean the smart-contract rules and codebases that define how transactions, markets, staking, lending, swaps, and other actions behave in decentralized systems.

Protocols form the backbone of DeFi, infrastructure, and application interactions in the blockchain world.

Why study them?

Because protocol health is a signal: it tells where developers might build next, where capital flows, and which ecosystems may dominate.

To assess that health, two metrics matter:

• TVL (Total Value Locked): how much capital (in USD equivalent) is committed in a protocol’s contracts - staking, lending, liquidity pools, etc.
• Active Users: how many distinct wallets interact with the protocol (via swaps, deposits, governance, etc), measured daily or monthly.

TVL reflects capital confidence and liquidity depth; Active Users reflect real adoption, stickiness, and everyday usage.

In this blog, we'll identify the top protocols by both these lenses. We’ll look at key case studies, analyze overlap between the two dimensions, and draw out lessons for builders, DAOs, and investors.

Let’s dive in.

Understanding TVL & Active Users: Two Core Metrics of Blockchain Adoption

In the introduction, we identified Total Value Locked (TVL) and Active Users as the two most important signals of protocol health.

Let’s unpack what each one means, why they matter, and why they must be viewed together.

Total Value Locked:

• Represents the total assets deposited into a protocol’s smart contracts, whether for staking, lending, or liquidity provision.
• A high TVL is often interpreted as a sign of trust and depth of liquidity, which is why it has been the dominant metric in DeFi for years.
• For example, Lido Finance consistently holds $38B in staked ETH, showing the strength of institutional confidence and its central role in Ethereum’s security model.

Active Users:

• By contrast, measure how many unique wallets interact with a protocol within a given time frame (daily or monthly).
• This captures whether people are actually using the system beyond parking capital.
• Uniswap, for instance, attracts 9M of wallets every month for swaps, while Jupiter on Solana has surged in usage as low fees and fast execution draw in retail traders.
• These signals reveal real adoption and product-market fit.

Why Both Metrics Together Define Real Protocol Success

On their own, each metric can be misleading. Curve Finance, for instance, still commands one of the deepest liquidity pools in DeFi, yet its user base has remained relatively flat.

On the flip side, Solana-based DEXs record impressive daily wallet activity but manage smaller liquidity pools compared to Ethereum protocols. Neither picture tells the whole story.

That’s why investors, DAOs, and analysts increasingly track both. Some analytics platforms even combine them into composite health scores, weighing capital depth against real engagement to provide a fuller picture of long-term sustainability.

TVL shows where the money is, while Active Users show where the people are.

A protocol only becomes durable when both metrics align. And that’s the lens we’ll use in the next section, where we define how we ranked the leaders.

How the 2025 Protocol Rankings Were Compiled

Before we look at the leaders, it’s important to explain how these rankings were built.

Protocol metrics can be noisy, and without a clear method it’s easy to misread the data. Here’s the approach we used to balance both liquidity depth and real adoption.

Data Sources

We relied on multiple well-known analytics platforms to avoid bias from a single source:

• DefiLlama: the most widely used aggregator for TVL across chains and protocols.
• Artemis: real-time blockchain activity tracking, including active addresses and transactions.
• Token Terminal and DappRadar: used to cross-check usage, fees, and revenues.
• Public chain explorers: for verifying activity directly on-chain.

By layering these sources, we reduce the chance of misreporting or overstatement.

Filters Used to Ensure Sustainable Protocol Activity

Not every spike in TVL or user count tells the full story. We applied a few filters to focus on sustainable activity:

• Consistency matters: Only protocols showing steady liquidity or user activity over time, not just short bursts.
• Excluding inflated numbers: Temporary boosts from airdrops, liquidity mining, or recycled deposits (where funds loop back to inflate TVL) were filtered out.
• Cross-checks: Where possible, we confirmed that user growth matched liquidity growth, so we don’t rank a protocol high if only one metric looks good.

Ranking Logic

• We created two separate rankings: one for TVL and one for Active Users.
• Then we looked for overlap leaders, protocols that consistently score high on both.
• When the two metrics clashed, we leaned slightly toward sustained user activity over sudden liquidity jumps, since adoption tends to drive long-term value more reliably than capital alone.

Snapshot Timing

All data points are based on the latest available monthly snapshot as of September 2025, at the time of writing. Since these numbers change quickly, the methodology matters more than the specific values.

This process ensures our rankings highlight protocols that combine liquidity confidence with real adoption.

With that framework set, let’s look at the protocols holding the deepest pools of capital today.

Top 10 Blockchain Protocols by TVL and Active Users

With methodology and metrics in place, let’s examine which protocols currently command the deepest capital pools.

These case studies incorporate real TVL from DefiLlama and Active users from Token Terminal. Because TVL& Active users are dynamic, we’ll note the snapshot timing.

The table highlights how liquidity and adoption rarely sit in the same place. Each protocol leans toward one strength, with only a few managing to bridge both.

• Liquidity-heavy leaders

Protocols like Lido, Aave, Curve, and MakerDAO dominate in TVL, showing deep institutional confidence and composability across DeFi. Their capital depth gives them resilience, but their user numbers are comparatively modest.

This makes them a stable infrastructure but less retail-driven.

• User-heavy platforms

Jupiter, Magic Eden, and Friend.tech demonstrate the opposite. They generate massive wallet activity and engagement but attract less locked value.

They are critical for adoption and onboarding, but without deep liquidity their sustainability can be tested in volatile markets.

• Overlap leaders

Uniswap and EigenLayer stand out as rare cases where liquidity and users converge. Uniswap combines billions in liquidity with millions of active wallets, while EigenLayer pairs $18B+ in restaked ETH with thousands of engaged operators and delegators.

These protocols show what long-term resilience looks like in Web3 capital that isn’t idle and adoption that isn’t shallow.

Liquidity without users risks stagnation, while users without liquidity risk collapse. The strongest protocols are those that align both, making overlap the new benchmark for protocol health in 2025 and beyond.

Key Protocol Insights

Uniswap

Uniswap is the leading decentralized exchange (DEX), deployed across Ethereum and L2s.

Values: ~$5.73B TVL and ~1.9M weekly active users (Sept 30, 2025).

What this suggests: One of the rare overlap leaders, Uniswap balances liquidity and adoption better than almost any other protocol.

Strengths:

• Deep liquidity across chains ensures efficient trading.
• v4’s “hooks” architecture supports programmable swaps and new strategies.
• Trusted by both institutional players and retail wallets.

Weaknesses:

• Gas costs on Ethereum mainnet remain prohibitive for smaller traders.
• Aggregators like 1inch or Solana DEXs compete for order flow.

Takeaway: Uniswap is the benchmark for DEX adoption and liquidity, setting the pace for the industry.

Aave

Aave is a multichain lending and borrowing protocol.

Values: ~$44.9B TVL and ~54K WAU (Sept 30, 2025).

What this suggests: Aave is liquidity-rich and highly interactive, with active lending and borrowing cycles across chains.

Strengths:

• Deep integration with DeFi (used as a liquidity backstop by many apps).
• Risk-segmented markets across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, and others.
• Institutional adoption via Aave Arc.

Weaknesses:

• Dependence on volatile collateral assets.
• Borrowing demand fluctuates with interest rate dynamics.

Takeaway: Aave is one of the most sustainable DeFi protocols, combining capital depth with real user activity.

EigenLayer

EigenLayer is a restaking protocol that allows staked ETH and other assets to secure additional services.

Values: ~$18.8B TVL and ~5.2K WAU (Sept 30, 2025).

What this suggests: EigenLayer has become a capital magnet while building an active network of operators and delegators.

Strengths:

• Unlocks new capital efficiency through restaking.
• Expanding operator ecosystem with >1,300 operators and 130+ AVSs.
• Early mover in modular blockchain security.

Weaknesses:

• Complexity deters average users.
• Risk stacking if staked assets are overexposed.
• Regulatory scrutiny possible due to security-market parallels.

Takeaway: EigenLayer is pioneering a new model where liquidity and participation converge, though it’s still early.

Lido

Lido is the largest liquid staking protocol, primarily for Ethereum.

Values: ~$38.3B TVL and ~2.2K WAU (Sept 30, 2025).

What this suggests: Lido dominates ETH staking but has limited direct user interaction, most activity is passive.

Strengths:

• Core to Ethereum’s staking economy (stETH widely used).
• Supported by institutions and integrated across DeFi.
• Simple UX for staking without running validators.

Weaknesses:

• Centralization risks due to node operator concentration.
• Yield compression as staking participation increases.
• Limited active engagement beyond staking.

Takeaway: Lido is liquidity-heavy by design, its strength lies in stability, not in user activity.

Curve

Curve is a DEX specializing in stablecoin swaps with low slippage.

Values: ~$2.4B TVL and ~15.2K WAU (Sept 30, 2025).

What this suggests: Curve retains capital efficiency for stablecoins but struggles with broader user adoption.

Strengths:

• Deep stablecoin liquidity pools, efficient for pegged assets.
• Widely used by other DeFi protocols as a liquidity source.
• Strong brand reputation in DeFi.

Weaknesses:

• Limited use cases beyond stable swaps.
• Declining adoption vs. newer hybrid DEXs.
• Governance and tokenomics under pressure.

Takeaway: Curve remains a backbone for stablecoin liquidity but lags in expanding its user base.

MakerDAO / Spark

MakerDAO is a lending protocol and stablecoin issuer (DAI), increasingly focused on real-world assets (RWAs).

Values: ~$55M TVL and ~344 WAU (Sept 30, 2025).

What this suggests: MakerDAO commands institutional-scale liquidity but minimal direct wallet interaction.

Strengths:

• Early leader in decentralized stablecoins.
• RWA integrations (U.S. treasuries, bonds) provide stable inflows.
• Governance maturity and resilience over multiple cycles.

Weaknesses:

• Complex governance structure.
• Limited retail adoption compared to other lending protocols.
• Highly exposed to regulatory narratives around stablecoins.

Takeaway: MakerDAO is liquidity-first, with strength in institutional adoption but weak retail activity.

dYdX v4

dYdXv4 is a decentralized perpetuals exchange, now migrated to its own appchain.

Values: ~$245M TVL and ~7.2K WAU (Sept 30, 2025).

What this suggests: A trader-focused protocol with modest liquidity but loyal niche adoption.

Strengths:

• Professional trading UX with order-book model.
• Appchain migration increases performance and autonomy.
• Loyal trader base despite competition.

Weaknesses:

• Liquidity scale is small compared to Uniswap.
• Perpetuals niche is vulnerable to market cycles.
• Governance decentralization is still maturing.

Takeaway: dYdX v4 is usage-driven, not capital-heavy, but sticky with its pro trading community.

Jupiter (Solana DEX)

Jupiter is a leading aggregator on Solana, routing trades across liquidity sources.

Values: ~$3.5B TVL and ~690K WAU (Sept 30, 2025).

What this suggests: Jupiter thrives as a user-heavy platform, benefiting from Solana’s speed and low fees.

Strengths:

• Aggregates liquidity across Solana DEXs, improving pricing.
• Huge retail adoption, Solana averages 2M+ DAAs.
• UX and cost efficiency drive user stickiness.

Weaknesses:

• Liquidity depth still trails Ethereum-based DEXs.
• Heavy reliance on Solana’s chain performance.
• Activity sometimes inflated by bots/microtransactions.

Takeaway: Jupiter showcases how user-first ecosystems can scale adoption faster than liquidity.

Magic Eden

Magic Eden is a leading NFT marketplace, originally on Solana, now multichain (ETH, Polygon, Bitcoin ordinals).

Values: No DeFi-style TVL; consistently among top NFT protocols by wallets.

What this suggests: Magic Eden shows strong adoption in NFTs, where activity metrics matter more than TVL.

Strengths:

• Cross-chain NFT support expands the user base.
• Strong community and brand in the Solana ecosystem.
• Frequent user interactions (browsing, minting, trading).

Weaknesses:

• User activity is highly dependent on NFT market cycles.
• Limited overlap with DeFi liquidity.
• Competition from OpenSea and Blur.

Takeaway: Magic Eden is a prime example of user-driven adoption beyond DeFi.

Friend.tech

Friend.tech is a SocialFi app enabling tokenized social interactions.

Values: ~$4.4M TVL and ~24 WAU (Sept 30, 2025).

What this suggests: Friend.tech illustrates the volatility of SocialFi, strong at launch but fragile over time.

Strengths:

• Innovative blend of social and financial primitives.
• Strong initial engagement loops (buying/selling keys).
• Demonstrated demand for social-token economies.

Weaknesses:

• Extremely volatile adoption, boom-and-bust cycles.
• Weak liquidity relative to DeFi protocols.
• Heavy reliance on incentives to retain users.

Takeaway: Friend.tech highlights SocialFi’s potential but also its fragility, user-heavy but unsustainable without deeper capital flows.

The strongest protocols are not those that win in just one metric, but those that perform across both. Uniswap, Aave, and EigenLayer illustrate what true protocol resilience looks like.

Next, we’ll zoom out and explore the broader trends driving why these overlaps emerge and how they’re shaping the future of DeFi and Web3 protocols.

Trends Shaping Protocol Success in 2025

In the last section, we saw how only a few protocols manage to balance both liquidity and adoption.

The question is: why do they succeed where others fall short?

The answer lies in a set of emerging DeFi trends that are reshaping how protocols attract capital, engage users, and sustain growth.

These are not short-lived narratives; they are structural shifts defining the next generation of Web3 leaders.

Restaking and Modular Security Reshape Capital Efficiency

Protocols like EigenLayer have introduced a new design space by letting staked ETH and other assets secure additional services. This transforms idle capital into productive collateral.

• Impact: Restaking pushes TVL higher while keeping delegators and operators actively involved.
• Why it matters: Protocols that increase capital efficiency while sustaining active participation set the foundation for long-term dominance.

Real-World Assets Bring Institutional Liquidity to Web3

Projects like MakerDAO and Ondo Finance are bringing treasury bills, bonds, and off-chain collateral into lending protocols.

• Impact: RWA integration has made Maker one of the largest DeFi protocols by TVL, with billions of dollars in U.S. Treasuries backing DAI.
• Why it matters: Bridging traditional assets creates stable inflows, but demands strong governance and compliance. Protocols that get this balance right become magnets for institutional capital.

High-Performance Chains Drive User Growth (Solana, Base, etc.)

Chains like Solana show that speed and near-zero fees directly correlate with high daily active users.

• Impact: Solana averages ~2.3M daily active addresses, far higher than many rivals, driven by DEXs, NFTs, and games.
• Why it matters: User-first blockchains lower barriers to entry, proving that adoption often comes before deep liquidity. Protocols built here can scale rapidly if they attract capital later.

Intent-Based Trading Simplifies DeFi Experience

Beyond faster chains, trading models themselves are evolving, as highlighted in our Top DEX Trends in 2025 blog. Decentralized exchanges are shifting toward intent-based execution and liquidity automation.

Uniswap v4’s “hooks” and Solana’s Jupiter aggregator embody this shift, enabling users to define desired outcomes while the protocol optimizes execution behind the scenes.

• Impact: This reduces manual complexity, increases efficiency, and attracts both traders and liquidity providers.
• Why it matters: Protocols that abstract away friction and make DeFi feel seamless will naturally win both adoption and liquidity.

SocialFi and On-Chain Communities Reinvent Engagement

Social finance apps are proving that engagement can be just as valuable as capital.

Friend.tech, for example, peaked with tens of thousands of daily active wallets and over $50M in TVL during its growth cycles.

• Impact: Even in volatile markets, SocialFi apps show high retention, users return daily for interactions, not just yield.
• Why it matters: Community-driven stickiness matters more than speculative spikes. Protocols that embed daily engagement loops will sustain adoption even when markets cool.

Compliance and Governance Attract Institutional Capital

As institutions enter DeFi, compliance is becoming a competitive edge.

• Impact: Aave launched Aave Arc, a permissioned pool for KYC’d institutions. MakerDAO works with regulated partners like Centrifuge to onboard real-world collateral.
• Why it matters: Protocols that balance decentralization with regulatory alignment will capture deeper, longer-term institutional liquidity.

Synthesis of Trends

Across these shifts, one theme stands out: top protocols succeed when they align capital and adoption through innovation.

• Restaking makes liquidity more productive.
• RWAs bring stable inflows from traditional finance.
• High-performance chains bring users at scale.
• Intent-based models simplify trading.
• SocialFi keeps users engaged daily.
• Compliance unlocks institutional TVL.

These emerging DeFi trends explain why certain protocols are overlap leaders. They aren’t chasing vanity metrics; they’re creating durable ecosystems where liquidity and adoption reinforce each other.

Next, we’ll break down what this means in practice for builders, DAOs, and investors who want to position themselves in this evolving landscape.

Strategic Insights for Builders, DAOs, and Investors

The trends we’ve outlined don’t just explain why today’s leading protocols succeed; they also signal how different stakeholders in Web3 should adapt.

Whether you’re building, governing, or allocating capital, the ability to read both liquidity depth and user adoption is becoming non-negotiable.

Builders: Design for Adoption, Liquidity Will Follow

• User activity > vanity TVL: Early adoption is the clearest sign of product–market fit. Protocols like Solana DEXs show that daily active users often lead capital inflows.
• Design for engagement loops: Look beyond one-off transactions. The stickiest protocols (e.g., SocialFi apps) build reasons for users to return daily.
• Abstract complexity: The protocols winning adoption (Uniswap v4 hooks, Jupiter aggregator) simplify execution. Builders should focus on reducing friction, not adding features.

Builders who prioritize real user adoption and UX will attract liquidity over time, as capital follows usage.

DAOs: Strengthen Governance to Retain Capital and Users

• Governance maturity matters: Protocols with strong governance (Aave, MakerDAO) attract institutional capital because decision-making feels predictable and secure.
• Capital efficiency = community trust: DAOs that manage TVL productively (via RWAs, restaking, or lending) create stronger ecosystems and longer-term alignment.
• Engage your base: DAOs should measure not just votes but recurring participation. Sustained adoption starts with engaged governance communities.

DAOs that combine effective governance with capital efficiency are best positioned to retain both liquidity providers and users.

For a deeper exploration of how decentralized governance frameworks evolve in parallel with liquidity and adoption, read our blog on Top Governance Protocols.

Investors: Back Overlap Leaders with Sustainable Growth

• Beware single-metric bias: High TVL without active users = “ghost liquidity.” High users without liquidity = “unstable playground.” Both are fragile.
• Prioritize overlap leaders: Protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and EigenLayer that balance liquidity and adoption are more resilient across cycles.
• Watch trend alignment: Capital is flowing into restaking, RWAs, and UX-first ecosystems. Investors who track these vectors will spot durable opportunities earlier.

The most attractive investments are protocols where liquidity and adoption reinforce each other, creating compounding network effects.

Each stakeholder group has a different lens, but the common thread is clear: durable protocols are those where capital and adoption converge. Builders can design for it, DAOs can govern for it, and investors can allocate toward it.

Next, we’ll close with a conclusion that pulls these insights together and frames the bigger picture: why liquidity and adoption, together, are the new gold standard for protocol success.

Conclusion: Why Liquidity and Adoption Define the Future of Blockchain Protocols

For a long time, the scoreboard of Web3 relied on a single number. First, it was Total Value Locked (TVL) as the defining benchmark.

Then came daily active users (DAU) as a way to measure adoption. Both remain important, but in today’s ecosystem, neither alone signals true protocol health.

The protocols shaping the next phase of Web3 are the ones that unite deep liquidity with real user activity:

• Uniswap shows how a DEX can scale both capital and wallets.
• Aave demonstrates that lending liquidity translates into daily usage.
• EigenLayer is pioneering overlap in an entirely new category with restaking.

Across the industry, the same pattern repeats.

Restaking, RWAs, high-performance chains, intent-based trading, SocialFi, and compliance are not just emerging DeFi trends; they are structural shifts pushing protocols to turn liquidity into adoption and adoption into defensible liquidity.

The takeaway is clear:

• Protocols with only capital risk stagnation.
• Protocols with only users risk collapse.
• Protocols with both are building the foundation of the next cycle.

Looking ahead, as modular ecosystems expand and cross-chain activity deepens, protocols will be judged not just on scale but on how effectively they align capital and adoption across networks.

For teams navigating this landscape, whether building, governing, or investing, the lesson is simple: focus where liquidity and users converge. That is where the long-term value lies.

At Lampros Tech, we help teams cut through the noise, design token-efficient systems, and build for the protocols that last.

Whether you’re building a new DeFi protocol, optimizing liquidity systems, or integrating on-chain infrastructure, our team helps you design for scalability, efficiency, and verifiable adoption. To go deeper, explore our DeFi services.

Barsha Mandal

Growth Lead

Barsha is the Growth Lead at Lampros Tech, a blockchain development company helping businesses thrive in the decentralized ecosystem. With an MBA and expertise in content strategy, technical writing, SEO & scaling blockchain development initiatives and translating complex Web3 concepts into accessible communications that drive engagement and business growth.

CONNECT ON:

See more

See more